Wednesday, March 9, 2005

de[vices]: CD Players and Church Services.

this week at school we've been priveledged to have Dr. Marva Dawn with us doing a series of lectures. the lectures have been very good and i have enjoyed her a lot. she has been talking about consumerism in society and how it affects the church. she used analogy about something and it stuck with me and got me thinking and i want to use her analogy to make my own connection. she explained how our society has moved into a society based on devices. for example: if you had a child and you had two choices either to give them a guitar and guitar lessons or give them a CD player with 3 CDs, which would be better in the long run? well naturally we see that learning how to play music on a guitar is far better in the long run then giving them a CD player with 3 CDs. give a kid a chance to learn guitar (or any instrument) they form a number of relationships; with their teacher, fellow students, strengthen relationship with parents, with the audiences, etc...this does not happen with a CD player and CDs. if anything a CD player tends to isolate us while we listen. also the guitar forces us to be participants in the music and active. the CD player renders us passive; inactive...lazy. not only do we not learn music but we are always looking for the next big thing. we're always looking for the next cool CD because we grow tired of the CDs we have and we need something new, it becomes less about producing music and more about being entertained by music.
the question then is: has our weekly church services become our CD players? in the music world only a small portion of the people put effort into making the actual music, the majority of the people, the listeners, do simply that...just listen. sounds quite familiar when i think of a church service, where a small minority actually are actively involved in producing the service while the mass majority sit by and "listen". they just take it in.
our weekly sunday morning church services have indeed become our devices. the Church has become a society in and of itself that depends on devices and those devices are our weekly services among other planned programs. they have made us utterly passive and inactive in our walk with Christ and as a Church body in large, neutering our desire to be participants in our faith. like a guiatarist that refuses to learn anymore scales and rhythms, opting for the ease of throwing in a CD to be entertained, we as the Church and as individual followers of Christ have stunted our own growth by relying on the ease of wandering into our pew to be entertained. we rely so heavily on the service to feed us our weekly supply instead of digging in and learning how ourselves. but this is more than just the individual learning not to rely of the sunday service for the rest of the week, it is about the Church as a whole learning not to lean on the crutch of an all encompassing weekly service to be the crux of our existence.
Are weekly gatherings of believers important? YES!
but perhaps the way we depend on them as the centre focal point of the "ministry" that is done through the church as infact rendered us, as a body of believers, impotent.
see CD players are not bad. they are very good. listening to music helps you know about music; what it sounds like, what notes make you feel good, what notes make you uncomfortable, what bands are popular, how to distinguish styles, etc. but all it can do is teach you about music. it can help you know about music. but it cannot help you actually KNOW music.

13 comments:

Mme. Tiramisu said...

Wow! interesting comments you've made here. But my opinion is that not everybody has an interest in guitar playing nor may even have the talent to do so, even when taught. As you put it, listening to the CD player enriches us sub-consciously; so after listening to a good CD, we start humming it and pretty soon other people will ask us what we're humming and we get to spread the word.

So ends my small bit on consumerism...

darryl.cole.silvestri said...

Tiramisu, thank you for taking the time to read through my post, i appreciate, and i even more appreciate the fact that you wanted to comment on it.

i guess my question is...does your comment have anything to do with the spiritual side to my analogy or just the musical side?

because if it is simply about the musical aspect of my post then im afraid i won't comment because i think you have missed the point completely...

NathanColquhoun said...

i like the de[vices] part
clever roomate

NathanColquhoun said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
NathanColquhoun said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Mme. Tiramisu said...

I was continuing your analogy. So I'm not as thick as you think I am :o)

darryl.cole.silvestri said...

ok im gonna reply to KEVIN and TIRAMISU...and before i do i want to say that i am not saying that church services are bad. but when they become the focal point of our churches we are in danger.

Tiramisu - some people don't want to learn music, and thats fine for them. but i don't feel Christ has called his followers to be spectators. i mean humming along to a tune and then spreading the word (in the analogy we're talking about)...is nothing more than spreading a Gospel of Inactivity, spritually its just breeding more spectators. my warning would be to not fool yourself into thinking that talking and hearing a lot about Christ is infact engaging in a relationship with Him.

Kevin - you said this, "I guess my view on that is that a church service is meant to encourage the congregation and challenge them, to take their 'spiritual walk' and extend it further than the Sunday service"...and id agree...but this service becomes the central focus of the christian walk...and so the focal point of that walk is an event where you take a place in an audience and take in information about God...when a church body structures their existence around a service, it is natural that the individuals in that congregation will centre their own spiritual existence around that same service...that is dangerous.

i hope i've helped in answering some of your question the best i could...

darryl.cole.silvestri said...

'bah', thank you for your comment.

you said, "Well, it is well and good to identify and diagnose the condition...but what of the remedy. Anyone can take words and apply them to the situation in order to make an "interesting analogy" or a "clever observation". But it is someone truly intelligent that can provide an answer."

well the thing is that i am ok with fitting into the Anyone category. i never claimed to be "truly intelligent" and i never promised any answers. im sorry if i have failed you as a blogger, my intention was never to solve the problem for you. i was trying to make an observation whether it was clever or not, was not my concern. i posted it about it to start a dialogue not to dictate what needs to be done, Church is about a community i think its important that we come to answers together.

you said, "While I enjoy your analogy, I am not so fond of your constant sidestepping."

im not exactly sure where i sidestepped, except perhaps Kevin's question about whose fault it is, and well if i must answer that question to satisfy you, i would have to say, i dont know whose fault it is, maybe its the church's fault. i mean you can't single out any particular person or group. besides why do we need to put the blame somewhere? i don't find it necessary

you said, "You wish to open people's eyes and point out the insufficiencies of the church service, but you are just criticizing."

actually i didn't criticize the church service, i was pointing out the fact that if a church makes the weekly service a focal point, it becomes dangerous. if anything i said that weekly gatherings are good. they aren't bad. but when they become the central focus of the church, its dangerous.

you said, "There is no helping hand or further thought besides the original analogy."

my hope is that you'll wrestle with the analogy and whatever questions it raises in your life. i myself am wrestling through the answers.

you said, "in your view, Tiramisu's thoughts are inactive and apathetic."

well perhaps.

you said, "Kevin asks a number of questions (none of which you answer) and you criticize his view of the church service."

and what i said in the post right above yours was, "...and id agree..." so i actually agreed with Kevin, and i didn't criticize him at all, so im not sure what you mean.

you asked, "Is there a way to improve church services?"

well i truly hope so. but like i said im still wrestling through that answer for myself...

you said, "Or are we all to forget about attending church and do the ultimate....teach ourselves the music and play on street corners, like buskers, in order to spread the word? What do you think? "

well i never once said that we should ignore attending a weekly gathering. i think they are good. in the same way that a musician doesn't throw away his CD player. but perhaps we should be careful that the service doesn't become the central focus of our believing community.

you said, "As well, people are not as dense as you think. Arrogance is like having dead batteries in that CD player of yours...or a guitar that refuses to be tuned....tsk, tsk."

well i certainly don't think people are dense, or i suppose i would be giving far more answers. i never once thought Tiramisu was dense at all. and i certainly never meant to come across as arrogant so if i did and i offended someone i would sincerely like to apologize. sometimes i forget that people can't hear my tone of voice...

one quick comment as this is getting VERY long...Bah, you made a comment about "attending church"...isn't it interesting that as believers who are the Church, we "go to church", or "attend church"...i think its a perfect example of how we've made Church into a ritual we do, instead of a reality we live.

Anonymous said...

Hello. I never get tired of blogging! Seems there is always something very different to see. Must be the water!

Success to you

affiliate

Anonymous said...

Watch subject. Bush goes ballistic about other countries being evil and dangerous, because they have weapons of mass destruction. But, he insists on building up even a more deadly supply of nuclear arms right here in the US. What do you think? What is he doing to us, and what is he doing to the world?
Are we safer today than we were before?
The more people that the government puts in jails, the safer we are told to think we are. The real terrorists are wherever they are, but they aren't living in a country with bars on the windows. We are.

Anonymous said...

Bush and the Republicans were not protecting us on 9-11, and we aren't a lot safer now. We may be more afraid due to george bush, but are we safer? Being fearful does not necessarily make one safer. Fear can cause people to hide and cower. What do you think? What is he doing to us, and what is he doing to the world?
Are we safer today than we were before?
We have lost friends and influenced no one. No wonder most of the world thinks we suck. Thanks to what george bush has done to our country during the past three years, we do!

Anonymous said...

Shalom! Michelle Sevin . payday loans

erotic bisexual stories said...

I know you geeksve been sharing this apartment for weeks I knowall three of you know where Gingers got Gladys Barrett. Melvin was even using the psychologist approved picture book we hadbought several years ago in the eventuality of our sons importanteducation.
black dick white chick fuck stories
adult gay sex stories
female first sexy stories
erotic mature sex stories
free female masturbation stories
I know you geeksve been sharing this apartment for weeks I knowall three of you know where Gingers got Gladys Barrett. Melvin was even using the psychologist approved picture book we hadbought several years ago in the eventuality of our sons importanteducation.